OCR Will Use the Broader NIBRS “Criminal Sexual Contact” Definition Under Title IX — Here’s What That Means for Clery Officers

The Short Answer

Infographic comparing Clery Act and Title IX responses to the new NIBRS definition. Left panel shows a locked document labeled “Clery Act – Fixed Definitions” with the words permanence, clarity, and consistency. Right panel shows expanding documents labeled “Title IX – Broader Scope” with the words measured expansion and inclusive coverage. A balance scale sits between the two panels under the title “OCR & the New NIBRS Definition: What Changed for Title IX — What Didn’t for Clery.”The recent U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights (OCR) confirmation that it will apply the expanded Uniform Crime Reporting program NIBRS definition under Title IX does not change Clery Act crime statistics or reporting. It may require attention to institutional policy language.

Why Clery Statistics Are Unaffected

What OCR Has Said

What the Broader Definition Covers

The NIBRS “Criminal Sexual Contact” definition expands beyond traditional “Fondling” by covering:

  • Touching of any clothed or unclothed body parts (not limited to private parts)
  • Purposes of sexual degradation or humiliation (in addition to gratification)
  • Forced touching by the victim of the respondent’s body parts

Key Principle: Additive, Not Replacement

Any broader Title IX definition sits on top of the Clery Act requirement to prohibit fondling as defined in Appendix A. It does not replace that obligation.

Practical Steps for Institutions

  • Leave Clery crime statistics and ASR tables unchanged.
  • Review policy and training definitions of sexual assault / nonconsensual sexual contact to ensure they meet the broader scope for Title IX purposes.
  • Prefer civil-rights terminology (e.g., “Nonconsensual Sexual Contact”) over criminal language.
  • Continue to prohibit the original Clery-defined offenses.

Closing

Clery statistical reporting remains stable. Coordinate with Title IX colleagues on any needed policy updates. The dual-definition situation reflects different drafting choices by two offices within the Department, not a change to the Clery regulations themselves.

This post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Find this content useful? Share it with your friends!